Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Coronado v. Mayorkas et al
as 3:2023cv08571
Plaintiff:
Ever Antonio Alvarado Coronado
Defendant:
Alejandro N Mayorkas and Nicanor Guridi Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Reynoso v. DMGG LLC et al
as 2:2022cv02090
Plaintiff:
Juan Reynoso
Defendant:
DMGG LLC, Davida Marie Gonzales and Unknown Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Safeco Insurance Company of America v. Salgado et al
as 2:2017cv04014
Plaintiff:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Defendant:
Antonio Salgado, Monica Reynoso and Mariana Camargo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reynoso-Garcia v. USA
as 4:2016cv00569
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Virjinio Reynoso-Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv01530
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reynoso v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01224
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
Juan Manuel Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. $2,164,341.00 in US Currency
as 2:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
$2,164,341.00 in US Currency
Claimant:
Leonardo Cornejo-Reynoso
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Gallardo v. Monge et al
as 4:2010cv00351
Plaintiff:
Jesus Reynoso Gallardo
Defendant:
Alexis Monge and Cochise County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edsall, et al. v. Monge, et al.
as 4:2010cv00293
Plaintiff:
Robert Merle Edsall, Jesus Reynoso Gallardo, Luis Angel Rodriguez-Velarde and others
Defendant:
Alexis Monge and Cochise County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. Arpaio et al
as 2:2009cv00294
Defendant:
Joesph M Arpaio and Betty Adams
Plaintiff:
Mario Reynoso Diaz
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
