Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Ross v. Cohen et al
as 2:2024cv00847
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Defendant:
Rhiannon Gomes, Judge Elizabeth Krier, Judge John McGowan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ross v. Cohen et al
as 2:2024cv00848
Defendant:
Judge Kyle Cohen and Rhiannon Gomes
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel, Assault, Slander
Ross v. Gomes et al
as 2:2024cv00717
Defendant:
Nicole N. Santini, Rhiannon Gomes, Amira D. Fox and others
Plaintiff:
Michael James Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Darby v. Hicks et al
as 1:2024cv00923
Defendant:
Josephine County Inc., Wally Hicks, Chris Parton and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Darby
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Delgado v. Peace Love Solar LLC et al
as 0:2024cv60649
Plaintiff:
Christian Manuel Delgado
Defendant:
Peace Love Solar LLC, Rack Electric, LLC, Shahram Eslahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Pisano v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00520
Plaintiff:
Danielle Rhiannon Pisano
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Pearson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv03349
Plaintiff:
Rhiannon Pearson
Defendant:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Evanston Insurance Company v. Eiffert et al
as 1:2023cv09439
Plaintiff:
Evanston Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shirley Eiffert, Michael Eiffert, Edward Eiffert, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 oc Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
