Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
GIBBONS v. MONTGOMERTY COUNTY et al
as 2:2016cv01233
Plaintiff:
JOHN GIBBONS
Defendant:
MONTGOMERTY COUNTY, MONTGOMERY COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY, JULIO ALGARIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Cumberland County et al
as 1:2016cv00006
Plaintiff:
Shawn Joseph O'Donnell
Defendant:
Cumberland County , Cumberland County Adult Probation and Parole Department , Darby Christlieb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc. v. Rhinehart et al
as 1:2014cv01392
Plaintiff:
Cunningham Lindsey U.S., Inc.
Defendant:
Gregory Rhinehart and Vericlaim, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GALTOGBAH v. DOE et al
as 1:2014cv00126
Plaintiff:
TOYLAWUO GALTOGBAH
Defendant:
JOHN/JAN DOE, RHINEHART, WRIGHT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
KENNEY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv02590
Plaintiff:
DOROTHY L. KENNEY
Defendant:
MONTGOMERY COUNTY , CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE, INC. , MARGARET CARRILLO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhinehart v. Astrue
as 3:2012cv01890
Plaintiff:
Jason N. Rhinehart
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
JONES et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
as 2:2012cv01027
Plaintiff:
MARVIN JONES , ROBERT HARRIS , KEVIN LEWIS and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREJDA v. LONGLEY et al
as 1:2011cv00184
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GREJDA
Defendant:
ARCHIE B. LONGLEY, WALTER L. RHINEHART and KENT W. CANNON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RHINEHART v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40061
Plaintiff:
ABRAHAM RHINEHART
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
