Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Rhonda Reid v. State of Georgia, et al
as 23-10335
Petitioner / Appellant:
RHONDA REID
Respondent / Appellee:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GREENE COUNTY and COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY SUPERVISION
Rhonda Reid v. Tynasha Evans, et al
as 23-10290
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA REID
Defendant / Appellee:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
REID v. LAND et al
as 3:2022cv00053
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
JUDGE CLAY D LAND, GREENE COUNTY, STATE OF GEORGIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REID v. EVANS et al
as 3:2022cv00046
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
TYNASHA EVANS, SHARON STEMBRIDGE, TAMEKA CHAPMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
REID v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2021cv00099
Petitioner:
RHONDA REID
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GREENE COUNTY and MICHAEL W NAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1976
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
David Whitehead v. President William Clinton, et al
as 21-1671
Defendant / Appellee:
Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Howard University, New Line Cinema and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
David Louis Whitehead
REID v. STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 3:2021cv00007
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rhonda Reid v. Candace Lawson, et al
as 20-12350
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHONDA REID
Defendant / Appellee:
STEPHEN BRADLEY, DA, DONNIE HARRISON, Sheriff, CAMILLE HOPE, Bankruptcy Trustee and others
REID v. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE et al
as 3:2020cv00069
Plaintiff:
RHONDA REID
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and ROBERT GEARHART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
