Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Gonzales v. USA
as 4:2018cv00558
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzales v. USA
as 4:2018cv00560
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gonzales v. Underwood
as 4:2018cv00554
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Gonzales
Respondent:
Warden Underwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gonzales v. Underwood
as 4:2018cv00553
Respondent:
Warden NFN Underwood
Petitioner:
Ricardo A. Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BELTRAN-GONZALES v. CHATMAN et al
as 5:2015cv00358
Plaintiff:
RICARDO BELTRAN-GONZALES
Defendant:
BRUCE CHATMAN, RODNEY MCCLOUD, WILLIAM POWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ricardo Gonzales v. Deborah Hickey, et al
as 13-6345
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICARDO K. GONZALES, Military Inmate, FMC Lexington
Respondent - Appellee:
DEBORAH A. HICKEY, Warden, FMC, Lexington
Respondent:
COMMANDANT, UNITED STATES DISCIPLINARY BARRACKS, FORT LEAVENWORTH, KANSAS
Gonzales v. Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas et al
as 5:2012cv00142
Petitioner:
Ricardo K. Gonzales
Respondent:
Commandant, United States Disciplinary Barracks, Fort Leavenworth, Kansas and Deborah A. Hickey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
USA v. Lucas Ochoa-Penalosa
as 10-12784
Plaintiff - Appellee:
USA
Defendant - Appellant:
LUCAS OCHOA-PENALOSA, a.k.a. Ricardo Beltran-Gonzales, a.k.a. Jesus Gonzales-Gonzales
Gonzales v. Cmr. Social Security Michael J. Astrue
as 3:2008cv00032
Plaintiff:
Ricardo A. Gonzales
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Sayago-Gonzales et al v. Castillo et al
as 3:2007cv00995
Plaintiff:
Gonzalo Sayago-Gonzales, Josefina Aguilar De Sayago and Ricardo Sayago-Gonzales
Defendant:
Veronica Castillo, Mortgage Only, Inc., Mortgage Only, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
