Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv16855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Bravo et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company et al
as 4:2017cv02769
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Bravo and Diana Bravo
Defendant:
Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company and Kinneth Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 3:2017cv05089
Plaintiff:
Philip John Dixon , Teresa Drescher , Corey Larson and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as TXW/1:17-cv-00792
Plaintiff:
Philip John Dixon , Teresa Drescher , Angel Gonzalez and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Dixon et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
as 1:2017cv00792
Plaintiff:
Morgan Bowling, Michael Braden, Ricardo Bravo and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Ricardo Bravo-Bravo v. Jefferson Session
as 17-70245
Petitioner:
RICARDO BRAVO-BRAVO
Respondent:
SALLY Q. YATES, Acting Attorney General
Bravo et al v. PPD II, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv05400
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Bravo and Maria Elena Garcia
Defendant:
Charles Grossetto and PPD II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Bravo-Rosas v. Premo
as 6:2013cv00168
Petitioner:
Ricardo Bravo-Rosas
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ricardo Bravo-Velez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73515
Petitioner:
RICARDO BRAVO-VELEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Bravo-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 4:2011cv00786
Petitioner:
Ricardo Bravo-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
