Cases 1 - 10 of 60
KEHL v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
MATHEW KEHL
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01875
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01822
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01691
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00409
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
CHESHER et al v. ALLEGHENY COUNTY et al
as 2:2022cv01822
Plaintiff:
SHANE CHESTER, JOANNE M. KING, ANDREW NOSBISCH and others
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY, RICH FITZGERALD, LAURA ZASPEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
RICHARDSON v. FITZGERALD et al
as 2:2022cv00959
Plaintiff:
KEITH RICHARDSON
Defendant:
RICH FITZGERALD, ORLANDO HARPER and ADAM SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWN v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00507
Petitioner:
EBEN BROWN
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, COUNTY EXECUTIVE RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AVERYTT v. HARPER et al
as 2:2022cv00443
Petitioner:
JAVONIE AVERYTT
Respondent:
WARDEN ORLANDO HARPER, DEPUTY WARDEN ADAM SMITH, RICH FITZGERALD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
