Cases 1 - 10 of 5,909
Lancaster v. Slavich et al
as 6:2024cv00323
Plaintiff:
Richard Dennis Lancaster
Defendant:
Anton Slavich and FNU Pinon
Yarbrough v. L&B Transport, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Alexis Yarbrough
Defendant:
L&B Transport, LLC, Wilson Richard and Trailer Management Intenational, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Gonzalez v. Estate of Guadalupe T. Gonzalez et al
as 4:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Vincent Gonzalez
Defendant:
Estate of Guadalupe T. Gonzalez, Charles Griffin, David N. Longoria and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. ADAMS et al
as 4:2024cv02262
Defendant:
Valero Energy Corporation
Claimant:
RICHARD ADAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Retter v. Frontier Communications Parent Inc
as 3:2024cv01421
Plaintiff:
Richard Retter
Defendant:
Frontier Communications Parent, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02203
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rivera et al v. Landstar Ranger Inc et al
as 3:2024cv01382
Plaintiff:
Mauro Rivera, Maria Macedo de Espinoza and R. C.
Defendant:
Landstar Ranger, Inc. and Richard Arthur Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Richards v. Schmoker
as 4:2024cv02137
Plaintiff:
James Richards
Defendant:
Wayne Schmoker and Executive Director of the Texas Civil Commitment Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kaul v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 3:2024cv00163
Plaintiff:
Richard Arjun Kaul
Defendant:
Texas Medical Board, New Jersey Board of Medical Examiners, Steven Lomazow and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Newson v. Wiles
as 3:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Devoris Antoine Newson
Defendant:
Richard Wiles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
