Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Burkhart v. Leasure et al
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff: WILLIAM NOBLE BURKHART
Defendant: ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
Grobler v. Leasure et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff: SERGIO GROBLER
Defendant: ROBERT W LEASURE, BETH A TAYLOR, GREGORY C DAVIS and others
Johnson v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00498
Plaintiff: Richard E Johnson, Jr
Defendant: William R Hyatte, Jacqueline Scaife and Robert Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clervrain v. Chambers et al
as 4:2022cv00017
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Defendant: Brad Chambers, General Clif Todey, Joel Gorelick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON et al v. PENCE et al
as 1:2016cv01467
Plaintiff: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Defendant: MARION COUNTY JAIL, MIKE PENCE and STATE OF INDIANA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. TALBOT et al
as 1:2016cv01466
Defendant: MONICA GIPSON, NIKKI TAFOYA and P. TALBOT
Plaintiff: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2016cv01173
Defendant: PAULA DICKSON, GWENDOLYN M. HORTH, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Plaintiff: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DODD et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01499
Respondent: MARK DODD and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Petitioner: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. LEMMON et al
as 1:2015cv01455
Defendant: A. COLE, CONNORS, BRUCE LEMMON and others
Fourth Party Defendant: COOPERRIDER
Plaintiff: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. SCAIFE et al
as 1:2015cv01454
Defendant: BOND, J. MATHEWS and SCAIFE
Plaintiff: RICHARD KEITH JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?