Cases 21 - 30 of 193
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff:
William T Jarvis
Defendant:
Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tucker v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00978
Petitioner:
LuJuan Tucker
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grant v. Ervin et al
as 4:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Joseph Grant
Defendant:
John Ervin, Ms. Unknown Pucket and Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp v. Richard Adams
as 23-2335
Petitioner / Appellant:
Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Respondent / Appellee:
Richard Adams, Warden
Terron Millet v. Richard Adams
as 23-2181
Petitioner / Appellant:
Terron Millet, also known as Terronn Millett
Respondent / Appellee:
Richard Adams
McClendon v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00546
Petitioner:
Corey B. McClendon
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Huffman v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner:
Phillip A. Huffman
Respondent:
Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Adams v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv20093
Plaintiff:
Richard Adams
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gilley v. Precythe et al
as 6:2023cv03073
Petitioner:
Joshua R Gilley
Respondent:
Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams and Eric Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Blair et al v. Boyer et al
as 4:2023cv00189
Plaintiff:
Diamond-Donnell D. Blair and William C. Blair
Defendant:
Brian Boyer, Anne Precythe, Jeff Norman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
