Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 195
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv24098
Plaintiff: JOHN RICHARD ADAMS
Defendant: 3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Curtis v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2023cv03153
Plaintiff: Richard Adam Curtis
Defendant: 3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Tucker v. Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00978
Petitioner: LuJuan Tucker
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jarvis v. Iredell County Detention Center et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00119
Plaintiff: William T Jarvis
Defendant: Iredell County Detention Center, Travis Ward, John Grant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp v. Richard Adams
as 23-2335
Petitioner / Appellant: Bailey Trent-Kettlekamp
Respondent / Appellee: Richard Adams, Warden
Grant v. Ervin et al
as 4:2023cv00791
Plaintiff: Joseph Grant
Defendant: John Ervin, Ms. Unknown Pucket and Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huffman v. Adams We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2023cv00446
Petitioner: Phillip A. Huffman
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terron Millet v. Richard Adams
as 23-2181
Petitioner / Appellant: Terron Millet, also known as Terronn Millett
Respondent / Appellee: Richard Adams
McClendon v. Adams
as 4:2023cv00546
Petitioner: Corey B. McClendon
Respondent: Richard Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gilley v. Precythe et al
as 6:2023cv03073
Petitioner: Joshua R Gilley
Respondent: Anne L. Precythe, Richard Adams and Eric Schmidt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?