Cases 21 - 30 of 59
Harris-Allen et al v. Shin et al
as 1:2019cv05315
Defendant:
JI Hye Shin, Enterprise Holdings, Inc., Enterprise of South Bend and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen and Renee Harris-Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cobbs v. Freeman-Wilson et al
as 2:2019cv00277
Defendant:
Officer Justin Hedrick, Chief Richard Allen, Mayor Karen Freeman-Wilson and others
Estate Plaintiff:
Ke-Monte Cobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
CHRISMAN v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv02765
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN CHRISMAN
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHAFFER v. BETTS
as 2:2019cv00296
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN SHAFFER
Defendant:
BETTS, CARMICHAEL, D. KRAEMER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Allen et al v. Horne et al
as 1:2019cv03376
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen, Jr. and Renee Harris Allen
Defendant:
Success Leasing, Inc., New Prime, Inc. dba Prime, Inc., John Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MORRIS v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2019cv01967
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
RICHARD ALLEN MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mathis v. Markee et al
as 3:2019cv00396
Defendant:
M. Young, Officer Prifogle, Steven Moorein and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Allen Mathis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strauss v. Gary Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00027
Defendant:
D Kirk, Richard Allen, Karen Freeman and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael Strauss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Strauss v. Gary Indiana Police Department et al
as 2:2019cv00028
Defendant:
Captain Ken, Isiah Price III, Richard Allen and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Michael Strauss
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 18-1535
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
