Cases
Mawule Tepe v. Clifton Corker
as 23-1976
Plaintiff / Appellant: MAWULE TEPE
Defendant / Appellee: CLIFTON LELAND CORKER, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, TRAVIS R. MCDONOUGH, in his Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions, KATHERINE A. CRYTZER, in her Honorable U.S. District Judge and personal positions and others
Tepe v. Corker et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00423
Plaintiff: Mawule Tepe
Defendant: Clifton L. Corker, Travis R. McDonough, Katherine A. Crytzer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 23-1016
Plaintiff / Appellant: ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant / Appellee: HONORABLE ARTHUR J TARNOW, HONORABLE BERNARD FREIDMAN, HONORABLE PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Bergrin v. United States of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09681
Defendant: Corecivic, Inc., Dan Polster, Jane Branstetter Stranch and others
Plaintiff: Ronald A. Bergrin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antonio Hudson v. Arthur Tarnow, et al
as 14-2298
Plaintiff - Appellant: ANTONIO HUDSON
Defendant - Appellee: HONORABLE ARTHUR J. TARNOW, BERNARD FREIDMAN, PAUL J. KOMIVES and others
Hudson v. Tarnow et al
as 2:2013cv12604
Plaintiff: Antonio Hudson
Defendant: Arthur J Tarnow, Bernard Freidman, Paul Komives and others
John Sandles v. Clay, et al
as 12-1872
Plaintiff - Appellant: JOHN E. SANDLES
Defendant - Appellee: ERIC L. CLAY, JOHN M. ROGERS, JAMES L. GRAHAM and others
SANDLES v. Clay et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv12117
Plaintiff: John Eric SANDLES
Defendant: Eric L. Clay , John M. Rodger , James L. Graham and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Sandles v. Batista et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv11773
Plaintiff: John Eric Sandles
Defendant: Andrew Batista, George C Steeh, Doug Smith and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?