Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Devine, et al v. West Newbury, MA, et al
as 09-2488
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KRISTI L. DEVINE and MICHAEL P. DEVINE
Plaintiff:
M. TUCKER DEVINE, ERIN DEVINE, KAYLEEN DEVINE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
WEST NEWBURY, MA, JOHN DENNIS, LISA HOLMES and others
Interested Party:
GERALD FOSTER, BARBARA FOSTER, PAUL CARROLL and others
Devine, et al v. West Newbury, MA, et al
as 09-2488
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KRISTI L. DEVINE and MICHAEL P. DEVINE
Plaintiff:
M. TUCKER DEVINE, ERIN DEVINE, KAYLEEN DEVINE and others
Defendant - Appellee:
WEST NEWBURY, MA, JOHN DENNIS, LISA HOLMES and others
Interested Party:
GERALD FOSTER, BARBARA FOSTER, PAUL CARROLL and others
Cushing v. Clinton, Town of et al
as 4:2008cv40128
Defendant:
Clinton, Town of, Gerald M. Gaw and Town of Clinton School Committee
Plaintiff:
Richard Cushing
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Callahan et al v Anton et al
as 0:2008cv60887
Plaintiff:
Emerson D. Callahan, Joel W. Hurd, Allen Wagner and others
Defendant:
Mark Anton, Sherri Paisley, Ian Hahn and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Devine et al v. Town of West Newbury, Massachusetts et al
as 1:2007cv11720
Plaintiff:
Pro Se Party Kristi L. Devine, Michael P. Devine, M. Tucker Devine and others
Defendant:
Town of West Newbury, Massachusetts, John Dennis, Charles Courtemanche and others
Interested Party:
Gerald Foster, Barbara Foster, Paul Carroll and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert B. Collings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DORSEY v. KRAVCHUK et al
as 2:2007cv00151
Defendant:
MARGARET KRAVCHUK, GENE CARTER, BRETT HARPSTER and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES DORSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Dorsey v. Kravchuk et al
as 2:2007cv00187
Plaintiff:
James Dorsey
Defendant:
Margaret Kravchuk, Gene Carter, Brett Harpster and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
