Cases 1 - 10 of 19
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv19665
Plaintiff:
RICHARD FLOWERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
FLOWERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv00015
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES RICHARD FLOWERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Steven Stuckey v. Housing Authority of Cook Coun, et al
as 19-2136
Defendant / Appellee:
MANAGEMENT OFFICE FOR RICHARD FLOWERS HOMES, OFFICE OF PUBLIC HOUSING, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF COOK COUNTY and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEVEN STUCKEY
Flowers v. Kottemann et al
as 3:2018cv03023
Plaintiff:
Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Kottemann and E Moreland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. Kottemann et al
as 3:2016cv03194
Plaintiff:
Richard Flowers
Defendant:
Steven Kottemann, Administrative Hopp, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stuckey v. Housing Authority of the County of Cook et al
as 1:2016cv03443
Plaintiff:
Steven Stuckey
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the County of Cook, Management Office for Richard Flowers Homes, Office of Public Housing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Stuckey v. Housing Authority of the County of Cook et al
as 1:2016cv00621
Plaintiff:
Steven Stuckey
Defendant:
Housing Authority of the County of Cook, Management Office for Richard Flowers Homes, Office of Public Housing and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv01639
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodwin v. Carroll et al
as 1:2015cv00448
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Goodwin
Defendant:
David Carroll, Richard Flowers and Mrs. Provitt-Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
