Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al
as 5:2023cv03260
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Jordan Bell, Daniel Schnurr, Joel Hrabe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2022cv00229
Petitioner:
Richard Grissom
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Grissom v. Townsend
as 6:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Lonnie Townsend
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grissom v. Palm, et al
as 21-3194
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RICHARD GRISSOM
Defendant / Appellee:
ANDREW PALM, DANIEL SCHNURR, MARIA BOS and others
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Bell et al
as 5:2020cv03163
Defendant:
Devin Flowers, Christopher Loya, Raymond Stiggens and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom v. Telford Unit
as 1:2020cv00086
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
Telford Unit
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom v. Tucker
as 1:2019cv00204
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Defendant:
FNU Tucker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom (ID 33728) v. Palm et al
as 5:2019cv03178
Defendant:
Jessica Link, Andrew J. Palm, Patrick Mansfield and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Grissom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pointer v. Scott et al
as 3:2017cv01591
Plaintiff:
Theodore Pointer
Defendant:
Joe Scott, Richard Grissom, Chris Fly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grissom v. Roberts, et al
as 17-3185
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD GRISSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, in his individual and official capacity, JOHNNIE GODDARD, Deputy Secretary for Facilities Management, in his individual and official capacity, JAMES HEIMGARTNER, Warden, El Dorado Correctional Facility, in his individual and official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae:
STUART GRASSIAN, M.D., PABLO STEWART, M.D. and TERRY A. KUPERS, M.D., M.S.P.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
