Cases 11 - 20 of 27
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. v. PALM 1 LLC et al
as 2:2016cv03015
Plaintiff:
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
PALM 1 LLC and RICHARD HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
HARRIS v. BRONCS, INC
as 2:2016cv00728
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS, JR.
Defendant:
BRONCS, INC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Harris v. Risbon et al
as 3:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Richard Harris
Defendant:
David Risbon , Jerry Everhart , Mary Ann Morder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv07617
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HARRIS v. COREY et al
as 2:2014cv03136
Plaintiff:
RICHARD HARRIS
Defendant:
CHESTER POLICE DEPARTMENT , THE CITY OF CHESTER and WILLIAM CAREY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv05322
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIORLA, STEPHEN MADRA and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DJETOUAN v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2012cv01440
Plaintiff:
GERMAIN K. DJETOUAN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, LOUIS GIARLA, STEPHEN MADVA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TAYLOR v. PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS et al
as 2:2012cv01095
Plaintiff:
PETER KARLTON TAYLOR
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEMS, STEPHEN MADVA, JAMES DUCKWORTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERRIN v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07641
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND HERRIN
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, LOUIS GIORLA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. et al v. LUCOM USA, LLC et al
as 2:2011cv07266
Plaintiff:
AFAB INDUSTRIAL SERVICES, INC. , EVERETT L. FARR, III and HENRY HADRY
Defendant:
LUCOM USA, LLC, RICHARD HARRIS, XINIX PACKAGING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
