Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00096
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Smith
as 6:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Sheriff Larry R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS) et al
as 6:2022cv00198
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Hospital Housekeeping Systems (HHS), Palestine Regional Medical Center, Regina Chambers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. Zelle et al
as 6:2022cv00199
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Defendant:
Zelle and Capital One
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Johnson v. Franco et al
as 7:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Michael E Rutledge, Warden A Franco and TDCJ Executive Director
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 9:2019cv00118
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Court of Criminal Appeals
as 6:2019cv00413
Petitioner:
Richard James Johnson
Respondent:
Court of Criminal Appeals
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Johnson v. Angelina County D.A. Office et al
as 2:2018cv00336
Defendant:
Angelina County D.A., Court of Criminal Appeals, Angelina County Defense Attorney Winfred III and others
Plaintiff:
Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Johnson v. Richardson
as 18-11006
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD JAMES JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN RICHARDSON
Johnson v. Lafavers et al
as 7:2018cv00112
Defendant:
R Gonzales, M Moberley and J W Lafavers
Plaintiff:
R James Johnson and Richard James Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
