Cases 1 - 10 of 12
MELENDEZ v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv64981
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MELENDEZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MELENDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2019cv03634
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MELENDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Richard Melendez
as 17-3018
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD MELENDEZ
MELENDEZ v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2017cv02663
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MELENDEZ
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Anthony Aceves et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2014cv05678
Plaintiff:
Anthony Aceves, Craig Adams, Felicia Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles and Does
Melendez v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00526
Plaintiff:
Richard Melendez
Defendant:
The City of New York, Matthew Barber and John Doe 1-2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wendi Berndt, et al v. City of Los Angele
as 13-56142
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WENDI BERNDT, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, LUIS ALVARADO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, RALPH CAMARILLO, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
Ricardo Melendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 12-73630
Petitioner:
RICARDO ALFONSO MELENDEZ, AKA Richard Melendez, AKA Richard Alfonso Melendez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv02536
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Gegare et al v. Hoffa et al
as 1:2011cv03980
Plaintiff:
Fred Gegare , Steve LLoyd , Tim Dubois and others
Defendant:
James Phillip Hoffa and United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
