Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Reginald Bell, Sr. v. City of Tukwila, et al
as 11-35533
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD BELL, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF TUKWILA, TUKWILA POLICE DEPARTMENT, MARK DUNLAP and others
Bell v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2011cv00767
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bell, Sr
Defendant:
City of Tukwila, Tukwila Police Department, Richard Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mitchell v. Franke
as 3:2011cv00079
Respondent:
Steve Franke
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Petitioner:
Alan Richard Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mitchell
as 1:2010cv03590
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Richard Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mitchell
as 1:2010cv02569
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Richard Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Jenkins et al v. Washington State Gambling Commission et al
as 3:2010cv05531
Plaintiff:
Nicholas G Jenkins and Internet Community & Entertainment Corp
Defendant:
Washington State Gambling Commission , State of Washington , Rick Day and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MITCHELL v. KAO et al
as 2:2010cv03182
Plaintiff:
RICHARD MITCHELL
Defendant:
GARY KAO , STANLEY BRUCE MALKOWITZ , UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA HEALTH SYSTEM and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Mitchell
as 1:2010cv01358
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Defendant:
Richard Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00054
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bell v. City of Tukwila et al
as 2:2010cv00379
Plaintiff:
Reginald Bell
Defendant:
City of Tukwila , Tukwila Police Department , Washington Cities Insurance Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
