Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Potter v. Emerson Process Management et al
as 4:2023cv00982
Plaintiff:
Richard Potter
Defendant:
Emerson Process Management, Emerson Process Management LLLP, Emerson Electric Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14550
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICHARD POTTER
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv15619
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09372
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY RICHARD POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. C.R. BARD et al
as 2:2018cv01054
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Richard Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. C.R. BARD et al
as 2:2018cv13169
Defendant:
DAVOL, INC. and C.R. BARD
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv10094
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC") and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD POTTER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POTTER et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 4:2009cv01493
Plaintiff:
LORINA D. POTTER and RICHARD POTTER
Defendant:
Organon USA, Inc., Organon Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Organon International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
POTTER et al v. ORGANON USA, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv03745
Plaintiff:
LORINA D. POTTER and RICHARD POTTER
Defendant:
ORGANON USA, INC., ORGANON PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., ORGANON INTERNATIONAL, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
