Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Moorer-Bey v Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2012cv00212
Plaintiff:
Stephan Moorer-Bey
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Thomas Kane, FBOP Associate Director of Programs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MOORER-BEY v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 1:2012cv00267
Plaintiff:
STEPHAN MOORER-BEY
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, THOMAS KANE, F.B.O.P. ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR OF PROGRAMS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COLEMAN v MARBERRY et al
as 2:2011cv00261
Defendant:
DEBBIE BURTON, DEBBIE BURTON, ROBERT ERWIN and others
Plaintiff:
MONROE L. COLEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Houston v. Daniels et al
as 1:2011cv00868
Plaintiff:
Eric Houston
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, Hutchings, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ruston v. United States of America et al
as 5:2011cv03003
Plaintiff:
Lester Jon Ruston
Defendant:
United States of America, Michael Nalley, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Thomas v. Szoke et al
as 3:2010cv00838
Plaintiff:
Clarence Thomas
Defendant:
David F. Szoke, W Fix, Mary Chastain and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Coleman v. Lappin et al
as 6:2011cv00273
Plaintiff:
Monroe L. Coleman
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Helen J. Marberry, Andrea McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coleman v. Lappin et al
as 6:2010cv00186
Plaintiff:
Monroe L. Coleman
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Helen J. Marberry, Andrea McPherson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stacker v. Holder et al
as 1:2010cv01150
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Stacker
Defendant:
Eric Holder, United States Bureau of Prisons, Richard W. Schott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CAMPANA v. MARBERRY et al
as 2:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL CAMPANA
Defendant:
STEPHEN DAVIS, J. DHALIWAL, FIVE UNKNOWN FBOP EMPLOYEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
