Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Toppin et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv09584
Plaintiff:
Henisha Toppin, Shjayia Jones and J.T.
Defendant:
City of New York, Marisa Louis-Jean, Brandon Agosto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Engwall et al v. Tinsley et al
as 8:2022cv00638
Plaintiff:
Dean Trew, Neal Engwall, Christie Sikora and others
Defendant:
Bobby Tinsley, Brian Quimby, Skuxchange, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
WATERS et al v. ABBVIE, INC. et al
as 2:2021cv16281
Plaintiff:
LAUREEN WATERS and RICHARD WATERS
Defendant:
ABBVIE, INC., ALLERGAN, INC. and ALLERGAN USA, INC.
In Re:
ALLERGAN BIOCELL TEXTURED BREAST IMPLANT PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moon v. USA
as 3:2020cv01086
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Gary Burgess, J LeClair and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moon v. Stickles et al
as 3:2020cv01088
Defendant:
Kathy Hill, David Brewer, Sarah Byrum and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moon v. USA
as 3:2020cv00837
Defendant:
B Basler, Kathy Hill, G Cooper and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Moon v. Byrne et al
as 3:2020cv00838
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Williamson County Illinois, B Basler and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
WATERS v. POWELL
as 7:2020cv00154
Plaintiff:
RICHARD WATERS
Defendant:
Sheriff CARTON POWELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moon v. Winn et al
as 3:2020cv00646
Defendant:
Katherine Siereveld, Garrett Fozzard, Gary Burgess and others
Plaintiff:
Darnell W Moon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard Waters v. Secretary, Florida Department, et al
as 18-13309
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICHARD WATERS
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
