Cases 51 - 60 of 340
Butler v. Richland County et al
as 8:2022cv02541
Plaintiff:
Lakeshia Butler
Defendant:
Richland County, Shane Kitchen, Mauricre Callahan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Earl Powell v. Joseph Clarke
as 22-1817
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KEWON ENGLISH and EARL POWELL
Defendant / Appellant:
JOSEPH CLARKE, LEON LOTT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Richland County and RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02442
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Kewon English v. Joseph Clarke
as 22-1788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEWON ENGLISH
Plaintiff:
EARL POWELL
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH CLARKE, LEON LOTT, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Richland County and RICHLAND COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Scott v. Richland County
as 8:2022cv02031
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Gene Scott
Defendant:
Richland County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01847
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv01779
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Drayton v. Richland, County of
as 3:2022cv01545
Plaintiff:
Marcus Drayton
Defendant:
Richland, County of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
