Cases 71 - 80 of 193
Chapman v. Richland County Courthouse
as 1:2019cv01757
Respondent:
Richland County Courthouse
Petitioner:
Dwaine J. Chapman, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Laird v. Elliott et al
as 3:2019cv00716
Defendant:
Aaron Shaw, Municipality of Olney, Illinois, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher T. Laird
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Richland County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 3:2019cv00908
Defendant:
Gilbert Gallegos, Richland County Sheriffs Dept. and George Poulin, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Maceo Sandy Scott, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodall v. Richland County Jail et al
as 1:2019cv00650
Respondent:
Richland County Jail and Judge Ardis
Petitioner:
John Goodall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Sanders v. S.C. Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2019cv00877
Defendant:
Richland County Solicitor, Agent Eklund and S.C. Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Dennis F. Sanders
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Andrews v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00812
Plaintiff:
John D Andrews
Defendant:
Richland County Solicitor, Agent Gregory B, Agent Eklund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culbertson v. Richland County Sheriff's Department
as 3:2019cv00026
Plaintiff:
LeAnne Culbertson
Defendant:
Richland County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jacobs v. Richland County et al
as 3:2018cv03216
Defendant:
Randy Davis, Richland County, James Gilbert and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Family Court Division
as 1:2018cv02676
Petitioner:
Tyganda Gilmore
Respondent:
Family Court Division, Family Court of Richland County, Richland County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gilmore v. Hopkins Magistrate Court
as 1:2018cv02672
Petitioner:
Tyganda Gilmore
Respondent:
Hopkins Magistrate Court, Richland County Solicitor's Office and Richland County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
