Cases 1 - 10 of 10
DOOLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv13717
Plaintiff:
RICK DOOLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DOOLEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv91634
Plaintiff:
RICK DOOLEY
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Papaioan v. Riley et al
as 5:2011cv00082
Plaintiff:
Mihail I. Papaioan
Defendant:
Natalie C. Riley , Amanda Hughes , Rick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Hughes et al
as 1:2010cv02119
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Defendant:
Amanda Hughes, Kristen Hungness, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Riches v. Case et al
as 8:2010cv01931
Petitioner:
Jonathan Lee Riches
Respondent:
John E. Case, Jason Case, Ryan Case and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 5:2010cv00279
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riches et al v. Hungness et al
as 2:2010cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Lee Riches, Richard Gulietti, Daniel Anthony Weymouth and others
Defendant:
Kristen Hungness, Amanda Hughes, Natalie Riley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Papaioan v. Riley et al
as 5:2010cv00088
Plaintiff:
Mihail I. Papaioan
Defendant:
Natalie C. Riley, Amanda Hughes, Rick Dooley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martay Love v. Dr. Kristen Hungress, et al
as 08-6361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARTAY LOVE
Defendant - Appellee:
KRISTEN HUNGRESS, AMANDA HUGHES, SALLY HAMMITT and others
Love v. Hughes et al
as 5:2008cv00304
Petitioner:
Martay Love
Respondent:
Kristen Hungress, Amanda Hughes, Sally Hammitt and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
