Cases 21 - 30 of 429
(HC) Nunn v. Hill
as 2:2022cv01396
Petitioner:
Joseph Arthur Nunn
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ross v State of California, et al
as 2:2022cv00785
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Ross
Defendant:
State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Folsom State Prison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Douglas v. Hill et al
as 3:2022cv00884
Petitioner:
Patrick C. Douglas
Respondent:
Rick Hill and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chancellor Wade v. Rick Hill
as 22-16028
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHANCELLOR WADE
Respondent / Appellee:
RICK HILL
Tripp v. Christian County, Missouri et al
as 6:2022cv03119
Plaintiff:
Keith L. Tripp
Defendant:
Christian County, Missouri, David Loe, Detective Rick Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Moore v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00758
Plaintiff:
Sidni Alfred Moore
Defendant:
Rick Hill, L. Johnson, W. Critz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
v. Ross et al
as 2:2022at00465
Defendant:
Cynthia Ross, State of California, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
(HC) Wade v. Hill
as 2:2022cv00556
Petitioner:
Chancellor Wade
Respondent:
Rick Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Davis v. Hill et al
as 2:2022cv00407
Plaintiff:
Lloyd Clifton Davis
Defendant:
Rick Hill, Brown, R. Herrera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willie Grant v. Gary Swarthout, et al
as 22-55291
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIE ULYSESS GRANT
Respondent / Appellee:
GARY SWARTHOUT, Warden, KAMALA D. HARRIS and RICK HILL, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
