Cases 1 - 10 of 14
MCGREGOR v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 1:2021cv03107
Plaintiff:
RICK RAYMOND MCGREGOR
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MCGREGOR v. ETHICON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv11295
Plaintiff:
RICK RAYMOND MCGREGOR
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rufus Spearman v. Mary Parson, et al
as 20-1913
Defendant / Appellee:
[UNKNOWN] HARRISON, CASE MANAGER KRETZ, PSYCHOLOGIST MITCHELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RUFUS SPEARMAN
Spearman v. Parson et al
as 2:2018cv10673
Plaintiff:
Rufus Spearman
Defendant:
Mary Parson, Rick Raymond, Hanna Saad and others
Joel Carter v. MDOC, et al
as 16-2663
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOEL CARTER
Defendant:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Daniel Heyns, Director, KATHLEEN A. MUTSCHLER, Director, Corrections Mental Health Program, RICK RAYMOND, Western Regional Director, Corrections Mental Health Program and others
Defendant - Appellee:
PSYCHOLOGIST CARRIE MCROBERTS, SURJIT DINSA and JENNIFER PIRLOT, Mental Health Unit Chief
Wittman #799434 v. Reaume et al
as 1:2015cv00254
Plaintiff:
Brian Wittman #799434
Defendant:
Rosemary Reaume , R. Davonport , Rick Raymond and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wittman v. Reaume et al
as 2:2014cv12954
Plaintiff:
Brian Wittman
Defendant:
Rosemary Reaume , R Davonport , Rick Raymond and others
Wittman v. Reaume et al
as 2:2014cv12421
Plaintiff:
Brian Wittman
Defendant:
Rosemary Reaume, R. Davonport, Rick Raymond and others
Anthony Threatt v. Rick Raymond, et al
as 14-1141
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAYMOND, Unit Chief Psychologist, UNKNOWN KISSINGER, Psychologist, UNKNOWN HOULE, Psychologist and others
Anthony Threatt v. Rick Raymond, et al
as 13-2024
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY THREATT
Defendant - Appellee:
RICK RAYMOND, Unit Chief Psychologist, UNKNOWN KISSINGER, Psychologist, UNKNOWN HOULE, Psychologist and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
