Cases 1 - 10 of 11
William Ringwood v. Secretary, Florida Department
as 16-11678
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM HENRY RINGWOOD
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Ringwood v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00265
Petitioner:
William Henry Ringwood
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Hill v. M. Chapman, et al
as 10-3351
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ronald L. Hill
Defendant - Appellee:
M. Chapman, Cooks Forman, FCI, Forrest City, J. Ringwood, Assistant Warden's Secretary, TCI Bakersfield, D. Bowden, Mail Room Officer, FCI - Forrest City and others
Seno Carter v. Ringwood, et al
as 10-1762
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Seno J. Carter
Defendant - Appellee:
Ringwood, Director, F.C.C., Forrest City, Mr. Ponder, Food Service Staff, FCI - Forrest City, Davis, Food Service Staff, FCI - Forrest City and others
Hill v. Chapman et al
as 2:2010cv00015
Plaintiff:
Ronald L Hill
Defendant:
M Chapman, J Ringwood, D Bowden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tillman v. Ringwood et al
as 2:2009cv00145
Plaintiff:
Sean Tillman
Defendant:
Ringwood, T C Outlaw, White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matlock-Bey v. Ringwood et al
as 2:2009cv00087
Plaintiff:
Stephen Matlock-Bey
Defendant:
Ringwood, Ponder, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
El-Amin v. Ringwood et al
as 2:2009cv00078
Plaintiff:
Muhammad El-Amin
Defendant:
Ringwood, Ponder, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Ringwood et al
as 2:2009cv00070
Plaintiff:
Frankie Green
Defendant:
Ringwood, Ponder, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Ringwood et al
as 2:2009cv00065
Plaintiff:
Seno J Carter
Defendant:
Ringwood, Ponder, Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
