Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv07026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Dellisa Richardson v. Cascade Skating Rink, et al
as 26-2133
Plaintiff:
DELLISA RICHARDSON
Defendant:
CASCADE SKATING RINK and LIVE LIFE HEADPHONES LLC
Pawlowski et al v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2026cv11446
Plaintiff:
Justin August Pawlowski, KP 1 and KP 2
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Hillsdale County DHHS, Oakland County DHHS/CPS and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
RINK v. PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2026cv02812
Plaintiff:
AMY RINK
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA LLC and PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davis #223815 v. Albon et al
as 1:2026cv00605
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lamont Davis #223815
Defendant:
Unknown Albon, David Rink, Lonnie Blount and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sto-Cote Products, Inc. v. EZ Ice Rinks
as 1:2025cv15739
Plaintiff:
Sto-Cote Products, Inc.
Defendant:
EZ Ice Rinks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2025cv01230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv01439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
CARROLL v. MCCANN et al
as 5:2025cv04985
Plaintiff:
ARTIS C. CARROLL, JR.
Defendant:
LUKE MCCANN, UPPER DARBY TOWNSHIP, PENNSYLVANIA, ED BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moyer v. Murray, et al
as 25-6135
Plaintiff:
GREGORY ASHLEY MOYER
Defendant:
JAMES V. MURRAY, TRACY MCDANIEL, Honorable Judge of the Oklahoma 23rd District, Pottawatomie County, KATHERINE E. THOMAS, Honorable Judge of the Oklahoma 9th District, Payne County and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
