Cases 1 - 10 of 2,555
Cecil Elmore v. Ruben Islas, Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01719
Defendant:
Doe 16, Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas and others
Plaintiff:
Cecil Elmore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rivera et al v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
as 2:2024cv00953
Plaintiff:
Jesus J Rivera, Jr. and Veronica M Rivera
Defendant:
Costco Wholesale Corporation and Boyd Specialty Sleep
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02491
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Chavez et al v. Standard Fire Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00787
Plaintiff:
ALEJANDRO CHAVEZ, JR and ANGELI ELIZABETH RIVERA
Defendant:
THE STANDARD FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2473
Petitioner:
CELSO ALEXANDER RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Daniel Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, Roben Capili and Does 1 thru 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Rivera-Anaya
as 24-2040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA-ANAYA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
