Cases 21 - 30 of 2,569
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Rivera-Rodriguez v. Garland
as 24-2473
Petitioner:
CELSO ALEXANDER RIVERA-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Hundal v. Islas, et al.
as 24-2303
Plaintiff:
GURKIRN HUNDAL
Defendant:
RUBEN ISLAS, JR., MARTHA ISLAS ENRIQUEZ, JOE ZUNIGA and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00333
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Daniel Rivera v. United States of America et al
as 2:2024cv01241
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera
Defendant:
United States of America, Roben Capili and Does 1 thru 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Gurkirn Hundal v. Ruben Islas Jr. et al
as 2:2024cv01721
Plaintiff:
Gurkirn Hundal
Defendant:
Ruben Islas, Jr., Ruben Islas, Martha Islas Enriquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Rivera-Anaya
as 24-2040
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DANIEL RIVERA-ANAYA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Frederick George Roehler v. L. Lundy et al
as 2:2024cv01269
Plaintiff:
Frederick George Roehler, II
Defendant:
L. Lundy, D. Williams, S. Rivera and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Escamilla v. State of California et al
as 1:2024cv00364
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR), State of California, CDCR and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Miguel Escamilla
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
