Cases 1 - 10 of 186
Sita v. Champlain College et al
as 2:2024cv00390
Defendant:
Flavio Rizzo, David Mills, Champlain College and others
Plaintiff:
Keren Sita
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Dinero v. Orchard Park Central School District et al
as 1:2024cv00213
Plaintiff:
ROBERT F. DINERO
Defendant:
ORCHARD PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF ORCHARD PARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT, DAVID LILLECK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kimball v. Village of South Russell, Ohio et al.
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Kimball
Defendant:
Village of South Russell, Ohio and Michael Rizzo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5957
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
JOHNSON v. VON ROSENTIEL et al
as 2:2023cv04179
Plaintiff:
TARANI-ALIKE JOHNSON and TARANI A JOHNSON
Defendant:
MARTHA VON ROSENTIEL, MARTHA E VON ROSENTIEL, SHELLEY ROBIN-NEW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BRADFORD v. THE BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE et al
as 2:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
DREW BRADFORD
Defendant:
THE BOROUGH OF NEW PROVIDENCE, NEW PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF DAN HENN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Rizzo v. New York City Department of Sanitation et al
as 1:2023cv07190
Plaintiff:
Michael Rizzo
Defendant:
New York City Department of Sanitation and CITY OF NEW YORK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ed Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-55625
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5599
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
