Cases 1 - 10 of 248
Nathan Roach v. Liberty County Jail, et al
as 24-10706
Plaintiff:
NATHAN AVERY ROACH
Defendant:
LIBERTY COUNTY JAIL, MCEADY, KRUMNOW and others
ROACH v. EMMONS
as 5:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
EARL ROACH
Defendant:
WARDEN SHAWN EMMONS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roach v. Emmons
as 3:2023cv00247
Plaintiff:
Earl Roach
Defendant:
Warden Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Minor v. Whitehead et al
as 3:2023cv01568
Plaintiff:
Jerry Minor
Defendant:
Devin Whitehead, Nicholas Roach and Christopher Hart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb et al v. Shields et al
as 5:2023cv00618
Plaintiff:
James S. Holcomb, Karenkae Holcomb, Spencyr Kalberer-Ford and others
Defendant:
Douglas Shields, Sean Parks, Kirby Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv33713
Plaintiff:
ANDREW ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30513
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27595
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv23968
Plaintiff:
RYAN ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ROACH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv14867
Plaintiff:
CHAD ROACH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
