Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Audrey McAdams v. Susan E. Arnold et al
as 2:2023cv10542
Plaintiff:
Audrey McAdams
Defendant:
Susan E. Arnold, Mary T. Barra, Safra A. Catz and others
Hugues Gervat v. Robert Chapek et al
as 2:2023cv06389
Plaintiff:
Hugues Gervat
Defendant:
Robert Chapek, Christine M. McCarthy, Kareem Daniel and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv08558
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Votto v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv08246
Defendant:
Apple, Inc., Arthur D. Levinson, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
John Votto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bankhalter v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05881
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
Alan Bankhalter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Fine et al v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05863
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
The Rosenfeld Family Foundation, Andrew Fine and Tammy Federman SEP/IRA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Paz De La Huerta v. Harvey Weinstein et al
as 2:2019cv07682
Defendant:
Robert Weinstein, Burton Way Hotels LLC, Miramax Film NY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Paz De La Huerta
Not Classified By Court:
Tensor Law PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Zehrer v. Cook et al
as 4:2019cv05153
Defendant:
Arthur D. Levinson, Craig Federighi, Ronald D. Sugar and others
Plaintiff:
Terrence Zehrer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Eugene Towers v. Robert Iger, et al
as 17-15770
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EUGENE F. TOWERS, Derivatively on Behalf of The Walt Disney Company
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT A. IGER, ALAN BERGMAN, EDWIN CATMULL and others
Towers v. Iger et al
as 5:2015cv04609
Plaintiff:
Eugene F. Towers
Defendant:
Robert A. Iger , Alan Bergman , Edwin Catmull and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
