Cases filed in Pennsylvania
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01231
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03328
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
AUSTIN v. ISUZU COMMERCIAL TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
as 2:2022cv03162
Plaintiff: ROBERT AUSTIN
Defendant: ISUZU COMMERCIAL TRUCK OF AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
IN RE: AUSTIN
as 2:2022cv02480
Plaintiff: IN RE: ROBERT AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
RUSH et al v. WETZEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff: JOHN L. RUSH, RAHIEM FANT, JORDAN BATTY, SR. and others
Defendant: JOHN E. WETZEL and DEREK F. OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
AUSTIN v. SPRING CITY APARTMENTS et al
as 2:2021cv01335
Defendant: RICHARD SMITH, ALLISON SAUTNER, HORIZON HOUSE INC. SWATHMORE and others
Plaintiff: ROBERT AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv02050
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AUSTIN v. PIAZZA et al
as 2:2007cv01307
Petitioner: ROBERT AUSTIN
Respondent: JOSEPH J. PIAZZA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AUSTIN v. GILLIS, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2001cv07325
Petitioner: ROBERT AUSTIN
Respondent: THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA , THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and FRANK D. GILLIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?