Cases 51 - 60 of 331
James Spencer v. Robert Bentley, et al
as 15-10931
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD SPENCER, on behalf of others similarly situated individuals
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT BENTLEY, in his individual and official capacity, LUTHER J. STRANGE, III, in his individual and official capacity, CHRISTOPHER MURPHY, in his individual and official capacity and others
Dozier v. Armstrong et al (MAG+)
as 1:2015cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mary L.R. Dozier
Defendant:
Lawton Armstrong, Robert Bentley, Butch Binford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mims v. Bentley et al
as 7:2015cv00119
Plaintiff:
Hasalee Mims
Defendant:
Robert Bentley and Ron Abernathy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Price et al
as 2:2015cv00112
Plaintiff:
Earnest Lee Walker , Sr
Defendant:
Cheryl Price, Kim Thomas, Robert Bentley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Bentley et al
as 2:2015cv00058
Plaintiff:
Cedric Landon Jones
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00056
Plaintiff:
Calvin W Scott
Defendant:
Robert Bentley , James Woodruff , Lucile B. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Malone v. Bentley et al
as 1:2014cv00576
Plaintiff:
David Malone
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Thomas, Sharon Folks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ferguson et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2014cv02396
Plaintiff:
Cecil M Ferguson and William W Horsman, III
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas , Alabama Dept of Corrections , DeWayne Estes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilmore v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02377
Plaintiff:
Jacquavious Lewis Gilmore
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sims v. Bentley et al
as 5:2014cv02376
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sims
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Kim Tobias Thomas and Batina Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
