Cases 1 - 10 of 10
BRYANT BRANCH v. STRONG et al
as 4:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
AUNDRIA BRYANT BRANCH
Respondent:
ERIKA STRONG, MICHAEL CARVAJAL, JON P MCCALLA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brooks v. Washburn
as 2:2020cv01479
Petitioner:
Robert Brooks
Respondent:
Sue Washburn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brooks v. Warden, Union Correctional Institution
as 6:2016cv02099
Petitioner:
Robert Brooks
Respondent:
Warden, Union Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Brooks v. Jordan
as 3:2016cv01473
Petitioner:
Robert Brooks
Defendant:
Kevin D. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Briand Williams v. Leroy D Baca et al
as 2:2012cv03018
Respondent:
Leroy D Baca, Robert Brooks, Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr. and others
Petitioner:
Briand Williams
Briand Williams v. Leroy D Baca et al
as 2:2011cv09082
Respondent:
Sheriff Leroy D Baca, Governor Edmund Gerald Brown, Jr, District Attorney Steven L Cooley and others
Bob:
Sheriff Robert Brooks
Petitioner:
Briand Williams
James Brooks v. David DiGuglielmo, et al
as 11-1074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, DA BERKS and ATTY GEN PA
BROOKS v. DIGUGLIELMO et al
as 5:2009cv05120
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Respondent:
DAVID DIGUGLIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS COUNTY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BROOKS v. DIGULIELMO et al
as 5:2009cv02885
Petitioner:
JAMES ROBERT BROOKS
Respondent:
DAVID DIGULIELMO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF TOM CORBETT, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brooks v. Morgan County Sheriff
as 3:2008cv00109
Petitioner:
Willie Robert Brooks
Respondent:
Morgan County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
