Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Benjamin Schwarz v. Erwin Meinberg, et al
as 17-56216
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN R. SCHWARZ, in his individual and class representative capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
ERWIN MEINBERG, BRENDA BURCH, ROBERT E MCFADDEN and others
Benjamin Schwarz v. Erwin Meinberg, et al
as 17-55298
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN R. SCHWARZ, in his individual and class representative capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
ERWIN MEINBERG, BRENDA BURCH, ROBERT E MCFADDEN and others
Benjamin Schwarz et al v. Erwin Meinberg et al
as 2:2017cv00330
Defendant:
Eliezer Ben-Shmuel, Brenda Burch, Juan D Castillo and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin R Schwarz
Benjamin Schwarz, et al v. Erwin Meinberg, et al
as 14-55062
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BENJAMIN R. SCHWARZ, in his individual and class representative capacities and STEPHEN YAGMAN, in his individual and class representative capacities
Defendant - Appellee:
ERWIN MEINBERG, BRENDA BURCH, ROBERT E MCFADDEN and others
Benjamin Schwarz et al v. Erwin Meinberg et al
as 2:2013cv00356
Defendant:
Brenda Burch, Juan D Castillo, William F Dalius, Jr and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin R Schwarz and Stephen Yagman
Rhodes v. Chavez et al
as 2:2012cv01971
Plaintiff:
David Thomas Rhodes
Defendant:
Ricardo E Chavez, J Hoffman, Robert E McFadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prison, et al
as 11-56371
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID BRYANT
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, in his official capacity as Director of the United States Bureau of Prisons, ROBERT E. MCFADDEN, in his official capacity as Regional Director of the United States Bureau of Prions Western Region and others
David Bryant v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2011cv00254
Plaintiff:
David Bryant
Defendant:
Harley G. Lappin, Robert E. MCFadden, Francisco J. Quintana and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
