Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Securit
as 12-2936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert E. Freeman
Defendant - Appellee:
Commissioner of Social Security
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2011cv01276
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
FREEMAN et al v. AC&S, INC et al
as 2:2011cv62324
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. FREEMAN and OPAL FREEMAN
Defendant:
AC&S, INC , ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. , CELOTEX CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FREEMAN et al v. CELOTEX CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv71935
Plaintiff:
ROBERT E. FREEMAN, ROBERT E. FREEMAN, PAULINE FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
CELOTEX CORPORATION, CAREY CANADA INC, ROCK WOOL MANUFACTURING CO., INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Freeman v. Bekaert Corporation et al
as 2:2007cv02111
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Freeman
Defendant:
Bekaert Corporation and Bekaert Corporation Short Term Disability Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Freeman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 7:2007cv00379
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Freeman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
United States of America et al v. Land in Sumner County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way over a total of 3.28 Acres of Land, More or Less et al
as 3:2007cv00289
Plaintiff:
United States of America, United States of America, Tennessee Valley Authority and others
Defendant:
Land in Sumner County, Tennessee, Easements and Rights-of-Way over a total of 3.28 Acres of Land, More or Less, Robert E. Freeman, Robert E. Freeman and others
Cause Of Action: 16 U.S.C. § 0831 Tennessee Valley Authority Act
Robert E. Freeman v. American Standard, et al.
as VAE/2:04-CV-07692
Defendant:
American Standard
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Freeman
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
