Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Diaz et al v. City of Hartford Police Department et al
as 3:2018cv01113
Defendant:
Sean Spell, Luis Ruiz, Stephen Barone and others
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Leon Perez and Emilio Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Hartford et al
as 3:2017cv01374
Defendant:
City of Hartford , Hartford Police Department , James C. Rovella and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walcott v. Connaughton et al
as 3:2017cv01150
Plaintiff:
Ijahmon Walcott
Defendant:
Brian Connaughton and Robert Fogg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ouwinga et al v. Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01762
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ouwinga , Leann Ouwinga , David Ouwinga and others
Defendant:
Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc., Benistar Ltd, John Hancock Variable Life Ins. Co. and others
Witne:
Benistar Admin Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Ouwinga et al v. Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc. et al
as 3:2013mc00146
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ouwinga , Leann Ouwinga , David Ouwinga and others
Defendant:
Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc., Benistar Ltd, John Hancock Variable Life Ins. Co. and others
Witne:
Benistar Admin Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Compel
Type:
Other Statutes
Stephen Ouwinga, et al v. Benistar 419 Plan Services, In, et al
as 10-2531
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN OUWINGA, LEANN OUWINGA, DAVID OUWINGA and others
Defendant:
BENISTAR 419 PLAN SERVICES, INC. and BENISTAR LTD.
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HANCOCK VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, JOHN HANCOCK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, EDWARDS ANGELL PALMER & DODGE, LLP and others
Ouwinga et al v. John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2009cv00060
Plaintiff:
Stephen Ouwinga, Leann Ouwinga, David Ouwinga and others
Defendant:
Benistar 419 Plan Services, Inc., Benistar Ltd., John Hancock Variable Life Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
