Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Harden v. Sabin et al
as 3:2021cv03039
Defendant:
Amber Rene Sabin, Amber Rene Harden, Amber Rene Stoker and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2021cv00307
Defendant:
Amber Rene Sabin, State of Nebraska, Amber Rene Harden and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Harden v. Brian Gage, et al
as 21-2651
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Respondent:
Brian Gage and Scott R. Frakes, Director of Department of Corrections
Harden v. Palo Alto County, IA et al
as 3:2020cv03059
Defendant:
Amber Rene Sabin, Olivia Flannery, Andrew Leon Sabin and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. Tecumseh State Correctional Institute et al
as 8:2020cv00281
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Tecumseh State Correctional Institute and Nebraska Department of Correctional Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2019cv00492
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Respondent:
Doug Peterson, State of Nebraska, Scott Frakes and others
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Robert Harden v. State of Nebraska
as 19-3049
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Respondent:
State of Nebraska
Harden v. The State of Nebraska et al
as 4:2017cv03095
Plaintiff:
Robert Harden
Defendant:
Robert Clayton Hicks, Matt Kuhse, Aimee Melton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Harden v. Brian Gage, et al
as 14-3209
Petitioner - Appellant:
Robert Harden
Respondent - Appellee:
Brian Gage, Warden and Robert Houston, Director of Department of Corrections
Harden v. Gage et al
as 8:2013cv00356
Respondent:
Brian Gage and Robert Houston
Petitioner:
Robert Harden
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
