Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Collins v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00357
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00356
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem A. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00360
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Zachary L. Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gann v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00359
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
James R. Gann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Henline et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00345
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robinson v. Tuck et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00850
Defendant:
Officer Henderson, Elmore County Jail, Captain Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
Willie Floyd Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mann v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv01036
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Warden Estes, Susan Moncrief and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Jason Mann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
