Cases 1 - 10 of 32
HENLINE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv10256
Plaintiff:
ROBERT HENLINE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Collins v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00364
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Collins, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bryant v. Henline (INMATE 2) (CONSENT)
as 2:2020cv00562
Defendant:
Robert Henline
Plaintiff:
Derald Eugene Bryant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champion v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00554
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Champion
Defendant:
Robert Henline, Terry Blair, Eden Ragsdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Draughon v. Franklin et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00507
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Warden Estees, Captain Tuck and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony James Draughon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Champion v. Elmore County Jail (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00518
Plaintiff:
Roger Lee Champion
Defendant:
Elmore County Jail, Captain Tuck, Robert Henline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00346
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster, Kareem A. Jones, Michael D. Collins, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mareno v. Henline (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00580
Defendant:
Robert Henline
Plaintiff:
Wendell Leon Mareno, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webster v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00358
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Captain Tuck, Officer Templin and others
Plaintiff:
Cornelius Webster
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quinn v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00339
Defendant:
Captain Tuck, Officer Templin, Lieutenant Richardson and others
Plaintiff:
Marcus Quinn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
