Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv03463
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Defendant:
United States of America , National Association of Boards of Pharmacy, Washington State, United States of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271
Deshan Watson v. Maggie Miller-Stout, et al
as 11-35611
Petitioner - Appellant:
DESHAN WATSON
Respondent - Appellee:
MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT, ELDON VAIL, Director WDOC and ROBERT MCKENNA, WA State Attorney General
Rothermel v. Vail et al
as 2:2011cv01161
Petitioner:
Perry M Rothermel
Respondent:
Eldon Vail, Robert McKenna and Jeffrey Uttecht
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
King Mountain Tobacco Company, Inc. et al v. McKenna
as 2:2011cv03018
Plaintiff:
King Mountain Tobacco Company Inc and Confederated Tribes and Bands of The Yakama Nation
Defendant:
Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Watson v. Miller-Stout et al
as 3:2011cv05013
Petitioner:
Deshan Watson
Respondent:
Maggie Miller-Stout , Eldon Vail and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Franklin v. Weber et al
as 2:2010cv13539
Plaintiff:
Zena Franklin
Defendant:
Jeffrey Weber, Michael J. Olcese, Weber & Olcese, Law Firm of and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth Klym v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35374
Petitioner - Appellant:
KENNETH DALE KLYM
Respondent - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, STOLC and ROBERT MCKENNA
Robert Bonds v. Eldon Vail, et al
as 10-35302
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT BONDS
Respondent - Appellee:
ELDON VAIL, ROBERT MCKENNA, WA State Attorney General and WARDEN STOLC
Williams v. Glebe et al
as 2:2009cv01507
Petitioner:
Lance Williams
Respondent:
Pat Glebe, Eldon Vail and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klym v. Vail et al
as 2:2009cv05041
Petitioner:
Kenneth Dale Klym
Respondent:
Eldon Vail, Stolc and Robert McKenna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
