Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Roger Gillispie v. Miami Township, OH, et al
as 23-4001
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROGER DEAN GILLISPIE
Intervenor:
MIAMI TOWNSHIP, OH BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MILLER
Cross Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT MOORE
Defendant:
MIAMI TOWNSHIP, OH
Roger Gillispie v. Miami Township, OH, et al
as 23-3999
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ROGER DEAN GILLISPIE
Intervenor:
MIAMI TOWNSHIP, OH BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT MILLER
Cross Appellant:
MATTHEW SCOTT MOORE
Defendant:
MIAMI TOWNSHIP, OH
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv12660
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Gerlach et al v. Mackinac, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00147
Plaintiff:
Eve Hunt, Raymond Gerlach, Janice Barrera and others
Defendant:
Mackinac, County of, Jennifer Goudreau, Nora A. Massey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Poffenbarger v. Kendall et al
as 3:2022cv00001
Plaintiff:
Michael Poffenbarger
Defendant:
Frank Kendall, Robert Miller, Richard Scobee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Public Accomodations)
Graham v. Todd County et al
as 1:2020cv00210
Defendant:
Todd County, Vernon Albro, Kentucky State Police Officers and others
Plaintiff:
Norman Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Remmele v. Hinkle et al
as 0:2020cv00135
Plaintiff:
Morgan Remmele
Defendant:
Kings Daughters Medical Center, Don Bailey, Danna Hinkle and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv11235
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
