Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Otero v. Electro-Power Inc
as 2:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Robert Otero
Defendant:
Electro-Power Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Otero v. Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company et al
as 1:2022cv03298
Plaintiff:
Robert Otero
Defendant:
Cigna Health and Life Insurance Company, eviCore Healthcare MSI, LLC, Harold Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
John Otero v. Ralph Diaz
as 21-15540
Respondent / Appellee:
RALPH M. DIAZ, Acting Secretary for the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT OTERO
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00072
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
OTERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv20411
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OTERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OTERO v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv09328
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT OTERO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(HC) Otero v. Diaz
as 2:2019cv00381
Respondent:
Ralph M. Diaz
Petitioner:
John Robert Otero
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Anderson v. Nevens et al
as 3:2013cv00447
Plaintiff:
Arnold Anderson
Defendant:
Robert Liggett, Georgia Luce, Jennifer Nash and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wong v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv08026
Plaintiff:
Sze Tung Wong
Defendant:
The City of New York, MTA New York City Transit Authority, MTA New York City Transit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Marrero v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv07924
Plaintiff:
Izmehel Marrero
Defendant:
The City of New York, Maynor Serrano, Robert Otero and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
