Cases 31 - 40 of 46
Hogan v. Vestavia Hills Police Department et al
as 2:2016cv00648
Plaintiff:
Jake Robert Hogan, Jr.
Defendant:
Vestavia Hills Police Department, Robert Owens and Police Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company v. Heinzelmann et al
as 1:2015cv04084
Plaintiff:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tyler Heinzelmann and Robert Owens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
J. Bussey-Morice v. Patrick Kennedy, et al
as 15-14921
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. PEARL BUSSEY-MORICE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Preston Bussey III
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK KENNEDY, TIMOTHY HERBERNER, IVETTE GOMEZ and others
IN RE GENTIVA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., FLSA CASES
as 1:2015mi55555
Plaintiff:
Diane Smith, Cynthia Bailey, Marjorie Aldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Owens v. Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
as 1:2015cv01021
Plaintiff:
Robert Owen
Defendant:
Gentiva Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
J. Bussey-Morice v. Patrick Kennedy, et al
as 15-10537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. PEARL BUSSEY-MORICE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Preston Bussey III
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICK KENNEDY, TIMOTHY HERBERNER, IVETTE GOMEZ and others
In re: Robert Owen
as 14-11734
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT OWENS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Owens v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv14405
Plaintiff:
Robert Owens
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
In re: Robert Owen
as 13-13977
Petitioner:
In re: ROBERT OWENS
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
J. Bussey-Morice v. Timothy Herberner, et al
as 13-11057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
J. PEARL BUSSEY-MORICE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Preston Bussey III
Defendant - Appellee:
TIMOTHY HERBERNER, ROBERT OWENS and MATTHEW LEVERICH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
