Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Munoz v. Vidal et al
as 1:2018cv10584
Plaintiff:
John Munoz
Defendant:
Osvaldo Vidal, Donald Ferrera, Robert Vinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conte v. County of Nassau
as 17-869
Plaintiff - Appellee:
Anthony Conte
Defendant:
Larry Guerra, City of New York, Rhoda Zwicker, Individually and as a Clerk in the Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Nassau County, New York and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Bob Emmons, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York, William Wallace, Individually and as Assistant District Attorney of Nassau County, New York and Mike Falzarno, Individually and as Special Investigator for the Office of the District Attorney of Nassau County, New York
Bohannon v. Wessell et al
as 4:2014cv40176
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannon
Defendant:
Ernest Wessell, James O'Leary, Robert Vinal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conte v. County of Nassau
as 13-3054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Anthony Conte
Defendant - Appellee:
County of Nassau, New York, Nassau County District Attorney's Office, Denis E. Dillon, Individually and as Former District Attorney of Nassau County, New York and others
Hall v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 2:2010mc00001
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Vinal and Robert C. Vinal, Inc.
Movant:
HUB International Transportation Services, Inc. and John Light
Hall v. 84 Lumber Company et al
as 2:2010mc00012
Plaintiff:
Charles D. Hall, Sr.
Defendant:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
84 Lumber Company, Darren Richardson and Keith Connor
ThirdParty Defendant:
Robert Vinal and Robert C. Vinal, Inc.
Movant:
HUB International Transportation Services, Inc. and John Light
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
