Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Uniloc USA, Inc. et al v. Motorola Mobility LLC
as 2:2016cv00992
Defendant:
Motorola Mobility LLC
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA, Inc and Uniloc USA, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
Avaya Inc., ZTE (TX), Inc., Huawei Device Co., Ltd. and others
Counter Claimant:
LG Electronics Inc., ZTE (USA), Inc., Shoretel, Inc. and others
Consolidated Counter Defendant:
Uniloc Luxembourg S.A. and Uniloc Luxembourg, S.A.
Not Classified By Court:
Edward A Infante and Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
as 6:2012cv00855
Plaintiff:
Leidos, Inc., VirnetX Inc. and Science Applications International Corporation
Not Classified By Court:
Michael T McLemore, Robert W Faulkner and Francis McGovern, Professor
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ericsson Inc. et al v. D-Link Corporation et al
as 6:2010cv00473
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner, David Folsom and Gale R Peterson
Plaintiff:
Ericsson Inc. and Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
Defendant:
D-Link Corporation, D-Link Systems, Inc., Netgear, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Intel Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Uniloc USA Inc et al v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc.
as 2:2016cv00642
Plaintiff:
Uniloc USA Inc and Uniloc Luxembourg S.A.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics America, Inc. and PlayStation Mobile, Inc.
Consolidated Defendant:
BlackBerry Limited, Facebook, Inc., Apple Inc. and others
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner, Donald E Tiller and Alexander Brainerd
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations, LLC v. Guardian Protection Services, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01431
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Plaintiff:
Rothschild Connected Devices Innovations,LLC
Defendant:
Guardian Protection Services, Inc. and Leigh M. Rothschild
Consolidated Defendant:
ADS Security, L.P., Alarm Security Group, LLC, Central Security Group - Nationwide, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126 Patent Infringement
In re: Rembrandt Technologies LP Patent Litigation
as 1:2007md01848
In Re:
Rembrandt Technologies LP Patent Litigation
Defendant:
Adelphia Communications Corporation; Century-TCI California, LP; Century-TCI California Communications, LP; Century-TCI Distribution Company, LLC; Century-TCI Holdings, LLC; Parnassos, LP; Parnassos C, Cox Communications, Inc., Cox Enterprises, Inc. and others
Counter Defendant:
Rembrandt Technologies, LLC d/b/a Remstream
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk Jeffery N. Luthi, Rembrandt Technologies LP, Cablevision Systems Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Convolve, Inc. v. Dell Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00244
Defendant:
Western Digital Corporation, Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc., Dell Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Convolve, Inc.
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
LML Patent Corporation v. JP Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 2:2008cv00448
Not Classified By Court:
Robert W Faulkner
Plaintiff:
LML Patent Corporation
Defendant:
JP Morgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Company, Wachovia Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Fractus, S.A. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al
as 6:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
Fractus, S.A.
Defendant:
Samsung Electronics Research Institute, LG Electronics Mobilecomm U.S.A., Inc., Personal Communications Devices Holdings, LLC and others
Not Classified By Court:
V Bryan Medlock, Jr, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC v. Softlayer Technologies, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv00269
Defendant:
Google Inc., Match.Com LLC, Softlayer Technologies, Inc. and others
Intervenor:
Red Hat, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Bedrock Computer Technologies, LLC
Undetermined:
Hesha Abrams, Robert W Faulkner and Technical Advisor Richard David Egan
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
